Cites (43)

Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

1. Climate Sensitivity through the Lens of Measurement Practice. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2025 Ackermann, Matthias

   Confirmation & evaluation

   Full textCitesCited by

2. Stability, Robustness Reasoning, and Measuring the Human Contribution to Warming. Philosophy of Science. 2025 Dethier, Corey

   Robustness

   Full textCitesCited by

3. Paleoclimate Proxies and the Benefits of Disunity. Philosophy of Science. 2024 Watkins, Aja

   Calibration/tuning, Uncertainties

   Full textCitesCited by

4. Contrast classes and agreement in climate modeling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2024 Dethier, Corey

   Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods

   Full textCitesCited by

5. Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2023 Majszak, Mason, Jebeile, Julie

   Communication of uncertainties, Expert judgement, Values

   Full textCitesCited by

6. Usability of climate information: Toward a new scientific framework. WIREs Climate Change. 2023 Jebeile, Julie, Roussos, Joe

   Communication of uncertainties, Decision-making, Values

   Full textCitesCited by

7. Against “Possibilist” Interpretations of Climate Models. Philosophy of Science. 2023 Dethier, Corey

   Communication of uncertainties, Probability & possibility, Uncertainties

   Full textCitesCited by

8. Climate Models and Robustness Analysis – Part I: Core Concepts and Premises. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. 2023 Harris, Margherita, Frigg, Roman

   Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness

   Full textCitesCited by

9. The Unity of Robustness: Why Agreement Across Model Reports is Just as Valuable as Agreement Among Experiments. Erkenntnis. 2022 Dethier, Corey

   Robustness

   Full textCitesCited by

10. Confirming (climate) change: a dynamical account of model evaluation. Synthese. 2022 Kawamleh, Suzanne

    Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

11. The epistemic value of independent lies: false analogies and equivocations. Synthese. 2021 Harris, Margherita

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

12. Value management and model pluralism in climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2021 Jebeile, Julie, Crucifix, Michel

    Value-free ideal, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

13. Climate Models and the Irrelevance of Chaos. Philosophy of Science. 2021 Dethier, Corey

    Hawkmoth effect, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

14. Robustness reasoning in climate model comparisons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2021 O’Loughlin, Ryan

    Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

15. Data models, representation and adequacy-for-purpose. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2021 Bokulich, Alisa, Parker, Wendy S.

    Data

    Full textCitesCited by

16. Local Model-Data Symbiosis in Meteorology and Climate Science. Philosophy of Science. 2020 Parker, Wendy S.

    Data

    Full textCitesCited by

17. Understanding climate change with statistical downscaling and machine learning. Synthese. 2020 Jebeile, Julie, Lam, Vincent, Räz, Tim

    Machine Learning, Regional climate modelling, Understanding & explanation

    Full textCitesCited by

18. Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View. Philosophy of Science. 2020 Parker, Wendy S.

    Adequacy-for-purpose, Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

19. Structural uncertainty through the lens of model building. Synthese. 2020 Baldissera Pacchetti, Marina

    Parameterization, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

20. Understanding and assessing uncertainty of observational climate datasets for model evaluation using ensembles. WIREs Climate Change. 2020 Zumwald, Marius, Knüsel, Benedikt, Baumberger, Christoph, Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude, Bresch, David N., Knutti, Reto

    Ensemble methods, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

21. Evaluating Data Journeys: Climategate, Synthetic Data and the Benchmarking of Methods for Climate Data Processing. In Data Journeys in the Sciences. 2020 Parker, Wendy S.

    Data, Datasets, Reanalysis

    Full textCitesCited by

22. Initial-Condition Dependence and Initial-Condition Uncertainty in Climate Science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2019 Werndl, Charlotte

    Hawkmoth effect, Theoretical foundations, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

    Note

    An outline of predictions and projections in climate science through the lens of initial-condition dependence and initial-condition uncertainty. During the discussion of uncertainty, Werndl outlines two types which had not been discussed to much extent in the philosophical community. This new insight leads to many conclusions throughout the entirety of the paper.

23. What does robustness teach us in climate science: a re-appraisal. Synthese. 2018 Winsberg, Eric

    Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Robustness, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

24. Issues in the theoretical foundations of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2018 Katzav, Joel, Parker, Wendy S.

    Climate & climate change, Theoretical foundations, Variability

    Full textCitesCited by

25. The Significance of Robust Climate Projections. In Climate Modelling. 2018 Parker, Wendy S.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Robustness, Robustness, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

26. Climate Model Confirmation: From Philosophy to Predicting Climate in the Real World. In Lloyd, Elisabeth A., Winsberg, Eric (eds.) Climate Modelling. 2018 Knutti, Reto

    Confirmation & evaluation, Predictions and projections

    Full textCitesCited by

27. Values and evidence: how models make a difference. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2017 Parker, Wendy S., Winsberg, Eric

    Inductive risk, Value-free ideal, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

28. Computer Simulation, Measurement, and Data Assimilation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2017 Parker, Wendy S.

    Data

    Full textCitesCited by

29. On Defining Climate and Climate Change. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2016 Werndl, Charlotte

    Climate & climate change, Theoretical foundations

    Full textCitesCited by

    Note

    An outline of the ongoing debate regarding how to properly provide a definition of climate and climate change. Werndl first systematizes the debate by providing five desiderata that a proper definition of climate should follow. Ultimately, a number of candidates for a definition are discussed and Werndl argues that a definition focusing on a distribution over time for regimes of varying external conditions is the most promising as it meets all five desiderata.

30. Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2016 Oppenheimer, Michael, Little, Christopher M., Cooke, Roger M.

    Expert judgement

    Full textCitesCited by

31. An assessment of the foundational assumptions in high-resolution climate projections: the case of UKCP09. Synthese. 2015 Frigg, Roman, Smith, Leonard A., Stainforth, David A.

    Regional climate modelling, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

32. Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Frisch, Mathias

    Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

33. Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Frisch, Mathias

    Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

34. Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2015 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

35. A practical philosophy of complex climate modelling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2014 Schmidt, Gavin A., Sherwood, Steven

    Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

36. The epistemology of climate models and some of its implications for climate science and the philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2014 Katzav, Joel

    Confirmation & evaluation, Probability & possibility, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

37. Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices. Philosophy of Science. 2014 Frigg, Roman, Bradley, Seamus, Du, Hailiang, Smith, Leonard A.

    Hawkmoth effect, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

38. The Myopia of Imperfect Climate Models: The Case of UKCP09. Philosophy of Science. 2013 Frigg, Roman, Smith, Leonard A., Stainforth, David A.

    Hawkmoth effect, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

39. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nature Climate Change. 2012 Knutti, Reto, Sedláček, Jan

    Ensemble methods, Robustness, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

40. When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions*. Philosophy of Science. 2011 Parker, Wendy S.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Robustness, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

41. Adaptation to Global Warming: Do Climate Models Tell Us What We Need to Know? Philosophy of Science. 2010 Oreskes, Naomi, Stainforth, David A., Smith, Leonard A.

    Adaptation, Confirmation & evaluation, Regional climate modelling, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

42. Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles and probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2010 Parker, Wendy S.

    Ensemble methods, Probability & possibility, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

43. What might we learn from climate forecasts? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002 Smith, L. A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Hawkmoth effect

    Full textCitesCited by

Cited by (0)

No reference in the corpus is citing this reference.