References »
The Significance of Robust Climate Projections. In Climate Modelling. 2018
Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Robustness, Robustness, Uncertainties
Cites (6)
Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
Reanalyses and Observations: What’s the Difference? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2016
Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2015
Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models. Philosophy of Science. 2010
Whose Probabilities? Predicting Climate Change with Ensembles of Models. Philosophy of Science. 2010
II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009
Adequacy-for-purpose, Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods
Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling. Foundations of Science. 2006
Cited by (5)
Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
Paleoclimate Proxies and the Benefits of Disunity. Philosophy of Science. 2024
Contrast classes and agreement in climate modeling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2024
Diagnosing errors in climate model intercomparisons. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2023
Usability of climate information: Toward a new scientific framework. WIREs Climate Change. 2023
The Unity of Robustness: Why Agreement Across Model Reports is Just as Valuable as Agreement Among Experiments. Erkenntnis. 2022