References »
Climate Models and Robustness Analysis – Part I: Core Concepts and Premises. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. 2023
Cites (11)
Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
An ineffective antidote for hawkmoths. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2022
Initial-Condition Dependence and Initial-Condition Uncertainty in Climate Science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2019
Hawkmoth effect, Reliability & uncertainty, Theoretical foundations
Full textCitesCited byNote
An outline of predictions and projections in climate science through the lens of initial-condition dependence and initial-condition uncertainty. During the discussion of uncertainty, Werndl outlines two types which had not been discussed to much extent in the philosophical community. This new insight leads to many conclusions throughout the entirety of the paper.
Building confidence in climate model projections: an analysis of inferences from fit. WIREs Climate Change. 2017
Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change. Philosophy Compass. 2015
An assessment of the foundational assumptions in high-resolution climate projections: the case of UKCP09. Synthese. 2015
Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2015
The epistemology of climate models and some of its implications for climate science and the philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2014
Confirmation & evaluation, Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty
Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices. Philosophy of Science. 2014
The Myopia of Imperfect Climate Models: The Case of UKCP09. Philosophy of Science. 2013
When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions*. Philosophy of Science. 2011
Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Robustness, Values
Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models. Philosophy of Science. 2010
Cited by (0)
No reference in the corpus is citing this reference.