References (19)

References published this year, ordered by earliest, online or print, publication date.

1. Missing the Forest for the Fish: How Much Does the ‘Hawkmoth Effect’ Threaten the Viability of Climate Projections? Philosophy of Science. 2016 Goodwin, William M., Winsberg, Eric

   Hawkmoth effect, Reliability & uncertainty

   Full textCitesCited by

2. The Diversity of Model Tuning Practices in Climate Science. Philosophy of Science. 2016 Steele, Katie, Werndl, Charlotte

   Confirmation & evaluation, Confirmational holism

   Full textCitesCited by

   Note

   A discussion of what is dubbed the “intuitive position” of calibration and confirmation of climate models. In short, this position states, the tuning of a model directly influences the evaluation of said model, as a result the values used to tune the model cannot be used in the model’s evaluation. Steele and Werndl focus on the diversity of formal calibration methods and how the different perspectives relate to the intuitive position.

3. Expert Judgment for Climate Change Adaptation. Philosophy of Science. 2016 Thompson, Erica, Frigg, Roman, Helgeson, Casey

   Expert judgement, Reliability & uncertainty

   Full textCitesCited by

4. Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism. Synthese. 2016 Leuschner, Anna

   Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties, Communication of uncertainties, Reliability & uncertainty, Values

   Full textCitesCited by

5. Lessons on Climate Sensitivity From Past Climate Changes. Current Climate Change Reports. 2016 von der Heydt, Anna S., Dijkstra, Henk A., van de Wal, Roderik S. W., Caballero, Rodrigo, Crucifix, Michel, Foster, Gavin L., Huber, Matthew, Köhler, Peter, Rohling, Eelco, Valdes, Paul J., Ashwin, Peter, Bathiany, Sebastian, Berends, Tijn, van Bree, Loes G. J., Ditlevsen, Peter, Ghil, Michael, Haywood, Alan M., Katzav, Joel, Lohmann, Gerrit, Lohmann, Johannes, Lucarini, Valerio, Marzocchi, Alice, Pälike, Heiko, Baroni, Itzel Ruvalcaba, Simon, Dirk, Sluijs, Appy, Stap, Lennert B., Tantet, Alexis, Viebahn, Jan, Ziegler, Martin

   Theoretical foundations, Variability

   Full textCitesCited by

6. The trouble with negative emissions. Science. 2016 Anderson, Kevin, Peters, Glen

   Carbon Dioxyde Removal (CDR)

   Full textCitesCited by

7. Managing the carbon rift: Social metabolism, geoengineering and climate capitalism. 2016 Sapinski, Jean Philippe

   Geoengineering

   Full textCitesCited by

8. The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal. Philosophy of Science. 2016 de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada, Intemann, Kristen

   Inductive risk, Values

   Full textCitesCited by

9. Reanalyses and Observations: What’s the Difference? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2016 Parker, Wendy S.

   Data, Reanalysis, Reliability & uncertainty

   Full textCitesCited by

10. Variety-of-evidence reasoning about the distant past. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2016 Vezér, Martin A.

    Data, Proxies

    Full textCitesCited by

11. On Defining Climate and Climate Change. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2016 Werndl, Charlotte

    Climate & climate change, Theoretical foundations

    Full textCitesCited by

    Note

    An outline of the ongoing debate regarding how to properly provide a definition of climate and climate change. Werndl first systematizes the debate by providing five desiderata that a proper definition of climate should follow. Ultimately, a number of candidates for a definition are discussed and Werndl argues that a definition focusing on a distribution over time for regimes of varying external conditions is the most promising as it meets all five desiderata.

12. The adventures of climate science in the sweet land of idle arguments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2016 Winsberg, Eric, Goodwin, William Mark

    Confirmation & evaluation, Hawkmoth effect

    Full textCitesCited by

13. Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2016 Oppenheimer, Michael, Little, Christopher M., Cooke, Roger M.

    Expert judgement

    Full textCitesCited by

14. Computer models and the evidence of anthropogenic climate change: An epistemology of variety-of-evidence inferences and robustness analysis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2016 Vezér, Martin A.

    Attribution, Ensemble methods, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

15. Risk of multiple interacting tipping points should encourage rapid CO2 emission reduction. Nature Climate Change. 2016 Cai, Yongyang, Lenton, Timothy M., Lontzek, Thomas S.

    Abrupt changes & tipping points

    Full textCitesCited by

16. From Social Values to P-Values: The Social Epistemology of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2016 John, Stephen

    Value-free ideal

    Full textCitesCited by

17. The Shock of the Anthropocene, : the earth, history and us . The Shock of the Anthropocene. 2016 Bonneuil, Christophe, Fressoz, Jean-Baptiste

    Anthropocene

    CitesCited by

18. Accounting for Possibilities in Decision Making. In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. 2016 Betz, Gregor

    Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty

    Full textCitesCited by

19. Temporal Strategies for Decision-making. In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning. 2016 Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude

    Full textCitesCited by