References »
Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2023
Cites (13)
Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
Climate tipping points and expert judgment. WIREs Climate Change. 2022
Abrupt changes & tipping points, Earth System Science, Expert judgement, Values
Expert reports by large multidisciplinary groups: the case of the International Panel on Climate Change. Synthese. 2021
Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties
Value management and model pluralism in climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2021
Multi-model ensembles in climate science: Mathematical structures and expert judgements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2020
Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View. Philosophy of Science. 2020
Practice and philosophy of climate model tuning across six US modeling centers. Geoscientific Model Development. 2017
Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods
Values and evidence: how models make a difference. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2017
The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2017
Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation, Parameterization
Expert Judgment for Climate Change Adaptation. Philosophy of Science. 2016
Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nature Climate Change. 2016
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015
Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2010
II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009
Cited by (0)
No reference in the corpus is citing this reference.