References »
Philosophy of Hydroclimatic Hazards. In Reference Module in Social Sciences. 2027
Cites (19)
Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
Beyond Values: The Introduction of Subjectivity and Its Use in Decision-Making Under Uncertainty. Erkenntnis. 2025
On the safe side: Uncertainty awareness for hydroclimatic risk and loss aversion. PLOS Water. 2025
Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2023
Machine learning and the quest for objectivity in climate model parameterization. Climatic Change. 2023
Calibration/tuning, Expert judgement, Machine Learning, Values
Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2021
Making Confident Decisions with Model Ensembles. Philosophy of Science. 2021
Political Legitimacy in the Democratic View: The Case of Climate Services. Philosophy of Science. 2020
Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View. Philosophy of Science. 2020
Structural uncertainty through the lens of model building. Synthese. 2020
The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2017
Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation, Parameterization
On Defining Climate and Climate Change. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2016
Climate & climate change, Theoretical foundations
Full textCitesCited byNote
An outline of the ongoing debate regarding how to properly provide a definition of climate and climate change. Werndl first systematizes the debate by providing five desiderata that a proper definition of climate should follow. Ultimately, a number of candidates for a definition are discussed and Werndl argues that a definition focusing on a distribution over time for regimes of varying external conditions is the most promising as it meets all five desiderata.
Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change. Philosophy Compass. 2015
Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2015
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015
Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices. Philosophy of Science. 2014
Whose Probabilities? Predicting Climate Change with Ensembles of Models. Philosophy of Science. 2010
Holism, entrenchment, and the future of climate model pluralism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2010
II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009
Adequacy-for-purpose, Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods
Cited by (0)
No reference in the corpus is citing this reference.