philoclimate.ch

BIB  Help  Log in

References »

When is an ensemble like a sample? “Model-based” inferences in climate modeling. Synthese. 2022 Dethier, Corey

Ensemble methods, Reliability & uncertainty

Cites (16)

Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Evaluating Data Journeys: Climategate, Synthetic Data and the Benchmarking of Methods for Climate Data Processing. In Data Journeys in the Sciences. 2020 Parker, Wendy S.

    Data, Datasets, Reanalysis

  2. Climate Models: How to Assess Their Reliability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2019 Carrier, Martin, Lenhard, Johannes

    Confirmation & evaluation, Confirmational holism, Robustness

  3. Philosophy and Climate Science. 2018 Winsberg, Eric

  4. Values and evidence: how models make a difference. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2017 Parker, Wendy S., Winsberg, Eric

    Inductive risk, Value-free ideal, Values

  5. Reanalyses and Observations: What’s the Difference? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2016 Parker, Wendy S.

    Data, Reanalysis, Reliability & uncertainty

  6. False precision, surprise and improved uncertainty assessment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2015 Parker, Wendy S., Risbey, James S.

    Communication of uncertainties, Reliability & uncertainty

  7. The future of climate modeling. Climatic Change. 2015 Katzav, Joel, Parker, Wendy S.

    Confirmation & evaluation

  8. Are climate models credible worlds? Prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Betz, Gregor

    Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty

  9. A practical philosophy of complex climate modelling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2014 Schmidt, Gavin A., Sherwood, Steven

    Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation

  10. The epistemology of climate models and some of its implications for climate science and the philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2014 Katzav, Joel

    Confirmation & evaluation, Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty

  11. The role of ‘complex’ empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2012 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Data, Robustness

  12. Whose Probabilities? Predicting Climate Change with Ensembles of Models. Philosophy of Science. 2010 Parker, Wendy S.

    Ensemble methods, Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty

  13. Comparative Process Tracing and Climate Change Fingerprints. Philosophy of Science. 2010 Parker, Wendy S.

    Attribution, Confirmation & evaluation, Fingerprint studies

  14. Predicting weather and climate: Uncertainty, ensembles and probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2010 Parker, Wendy S.

    Ensemble methods, Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty

  15. Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality. Synthese. 2008 Parker, Wendy S.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Data

  16. Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2007 Stainforth, D.A, Allen, M.R, Tredger, E.R, Smith, L.A

    Calibration/tuning, Decision-making, Reliability & uncertainty

Cited by (1)

Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Diagnosing errors in climate model intercomparisons. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2023 O’Loughlin, Ryan

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness