philoclimate.ch

BIB  Help  Log in

References »

The role of ‘complex’ empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2012 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

Confirmation & evaluation, Data, Robustness

Full textCitesCited by

Cites (3)

Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Confirmation and Robustness of Climate Models. Philosophy of Science. 2010 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

  2. I—Elisabeth A. Lloyd: Varieties of Support and Confirmation of Climate Models. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  3. Computer simulation through an error-statistical lens. Synthese. 2008 Parker, Wendy S.

    Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

Cited by (12)

Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Diagnosing errors in climate model intercomparisons. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2023 O’Loughlin, Ryan

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

  2. Calibrating statistical tools: Improving the measure of Humanity's influence on the climate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2022 Dethier, Corey

    Attribution, Fingerprint studies

    Full textCitesCited by

  3. When is an ensemble like a sample? “Model-based” inferences in climate modeling. Synthese. 2022 Dethier, Corey

    Ensemble methods, Reliability & uncertainty

    Full textCitesCited by

  4. Philosophical Perspectives on Earth System Modeling: Truth, Adequacy, and Understanding. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 2020 Gramelsberger, G., Lenhard, J., Parker, W.S.

    Adequacy-for-purpose, Earth System Science

    Full textCitesCited by

  5. Philosophical Perspectives on Earth System Modeling: Truth, Adequacy, and Understanding. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems. 2020 Gramelsberger, G., Lenhard, J., Parker, W.S.

    Adequacy-for-purpose, Confirmation & evaluation, Understanding & explanation

    Full textCitesCited by

  6. Issues in the theoretical foundations of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2018 Katzav, Joel, Parker, Wendy S.

    Climate & climate change, Theoretical foundations, Variability

    Full textCitesCited by

  7. Communicating Uncertainty to Policymakers: The Ineliminable Role of Values. In Climate Modelling. 2018 Winsberg, Eric

    Communication of uncertainties, Reliability & uncertainty, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  8. Building confidence in climate model projections: an analysis of inferences from fit. WIREs Climate Change. 2017 Baumberger, Christoph, Knutti, Reto, Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

  9. Philosophy of Climate Science Part I: Observing Climate Change. Philosophy Compass. 2015 Frigg, Roman, Thompson, Erica, Werndl, Charlotte

    Full textCitesCited by

  10. Uncertainties, Plurality, and Robustness in Climate Research and Modeling: On the Reliability of Climate Prognoses. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 2015 Leuschner, Anna

    Ensemble methods, Reliability & uncertainty, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

  11. Climate skepticism and the manufacture of doubt: can dissent in science be epistemically detrimental? European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Biddle, Justin B., Leuschner, Anna

    Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties, Communication of uncertainties, Reliability & uncertainty, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  12. Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2015 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Robustness, Values

    Full textCitesCited by