philoclimate.ch

BIB  Help  Log in

References »

Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism. Synthese. 2016 Leuschner, Anna

Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties, Communication of uncertainties, Uncertainties, Values

Full textCitesCited by

Cites (4)

Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Climate skepticism and the manufacture of doubt: can dissent in science be epistemically detrimental? European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Biddle, Justin B., Leuschner, Anna

    Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties, Communication of uncertainties, Uncertainties, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  2. Who's Afraid of Dissent? Addressing Concerns about Undermining Scientific Consensus in Public Policy Developments. Perspectives on Science. 2014 de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada, Intemann, Kristen

    Full textCitesCited by

  3. Global warming: How skepticism became denial. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2011 Weart, Spencer

    Full textCitesCited by

  4. The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science. 2004 Oreskes, Naomi

    Expert judgement, Uncertainties

    Full textCitesCited by

Cited by (2)

Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Values and Objectivity in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Social Epistemology. 2020 Jebeile, Julie

    Value-free ideal, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  2. Seepage, objectivity, and climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2020 O’Loughlin, Ryan

    Value-free ideal, Values

    Full textCitesCited by