A discussion of what is dubbed the “intuitive position” of calibration and confirmation of climate models. In short, this position states, the tuning of a model directly influences the evaluation of said model, as a result the values used to tune the model cannot be used in the model’s evaluation. Steele and Werndl focus on the diversity of formal calibration methods and how the different perspectives relate to the intuitive position.
This reference is not cited by other references in the corpus.
Cited by (1)
Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
Understanding climate phenomena with data-driven models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2020
Understanding & explanation