References »
Abrupt Climate Changes and Tipping Points. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. 2023
Cites (24)
Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
Interacting tipping elements increase risk of climate domino effects under global warming. Earth System Dynamics. 2021
Severe weather event attribution: Why values won't go away. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2020
Earth system modeling with endogenous and dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE open World–Earth modeling framework. Earth System Dynamics. 2020
Tipping positive change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2020
Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020
The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2020
Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against. Nature. 2019
Storyline approach to the construction of regional climate change information. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2019
Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018
Abrupt changes & tipping points, Anthropocene, Earth System Science
Issues in the theoretical foundations of climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2018
Climate & climate change, Theoretical foundations, Variability
Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarship—an interdisciplinary literature review. Environmental Research Letters. 2018
Climate Change Attribution: When Is It Appropriate to Accept New Methods? Earth's Future. 2018
Building confidence in climate model projections: an analysis of inferences from fit. WIREs Climate Change. 2017
On Defining Climate and Climate Change. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2016
Climate & climate change, Theoretical foundations
Full textCitesCited byNote
An outline of the ongoing debate regarding how to properly provide a definition of climate and climate change. Werndl first systematizes the debate by providing five desiderata that a proper definition of climate should follow. Ultimately, a number of candidates for a definition are discussed and Werndl argues that a definition focusing on a distribution over time for regimes of varying external conditions is the most promising as it meets all five desiderata.
Philosophy of Climate Science Part II: Modelling Climate Change. Philosophy Compass. 2015
Climate change tipping points: origins, precursors, and debates. WIREs Climate Change. 2015
Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change. 2015
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015
Values and uncertainties in climate prediction, revisited. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2014
Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy. 2013
Tipping points in open systems: bifurcation, noise-induced and rate-dependent examples in the climate system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2012
Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2012
The tipping point trend in climate change communication. Global Environmental Change. 2009
II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009
Adequacy-for-purpose, Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods
Cited by (0)
No reference in the corpus is citing this reference.