philoclimate.ch

BIB  Help  Log in

References »

Calibrating statistical tools: Improving the measure of Humanity's influence on the climate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2022 Dethier, Corey

Attribution, Fingerprint studies

Full textCitesCited by

Cites (9)

Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View. Philosophy of Science. 2020 Parker, Wendy S.

    Adequacy-for-purpose, Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

  2. Computer Simulation, Measurement, and Data Assimilation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2017 Parker, Wendy S.

    Data

    Full textCitesCited by

  3. Reanalyses and Observations: What’s the Difference? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2016 Parker, Wendy S.

    Data, Reanalysis, Reliability & uncertainty

    Full textCitesCited by

  4. Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Frisch, Mathias

    Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation, Confirmational holism

    Full textCitesCited by

  5. Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Frisch, Mathias

    Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by

  6. Climate Models, Calibration, and Confirmation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2013 Steele, Katie, Werndl, Charlotte

    Calibration/tuning, Confirmation & evaluation

    Full textCitesCited by
    Note

    A discussion of the problem of double-counting in climate modeling, specifically when the same evidence is used to both calibrate a model and then confirm the adequacy of the results. Steele and Werndl turn to a Baysian approach to argue for a method of incremental confirmation, making double-counting unproblematic. For a response to this argument see Mathias Frisch’s 2015 paper “Predictivism and old evidence: a critical look at climate model tuning”.

  7. The role of ‘complex’ empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2012 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Data, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

  8. Comparative Process Tracing and Climate Change Fingerprints. Philosophy of Science. 2010 Parker, Wendy S.

    Attribution, Confirmation & evaluation, Fingerprint studies

    Full textCitesCited by

  9. II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009 Parker, Wendy S.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods

    Full textCitesCited by

Cited by (1)

Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Interpreting the Probabilistic Language in IPCC Reports. Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 2023 Dethier, Corey

    Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties, Probability & possibility

    Full textCitesCited by