philoclimate.ch

BIB  Help  Log in

References »

Climate skepticism and the manufacture of doubt: can dissent in science be epistemically detrimental? European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015 Biddle, Justin B., Leuschner, Anna

Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties, Communication of uncertainties, Reliability & uncertainty, Values

Full textCitesCited by

Cites (2)

Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. The role of ‘complex’ empiricism in the debates about satellite data and climate models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2012 Lloyd, Elisabeth A.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Data, Robustness

    Full textCitesCited by

  2. The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science. 2004 Oreskes, Naomi

    Expert judgement, Reliability & uncertainty

    Full textCitesCited by

Cited by (4)

Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Seepage, objectivity, and climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2020 O’Loughlin, Ryan

    Value-free ideal, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  2. Epistemic trust and the ethics of science communication: against transparency, openness, sincerity and honesty. Social Epistemology. 2017 John, Stephen

    Climate change communication, Expert judgement, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  3. Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism. Synthese. 2016 Leuschner, Anna

    Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties, Communication of uncertainties, Reliability & uncertainty, Values

    Full textCitesCited by

  4. Ontological Choices and the Value-Free Ideal. Erkenntnis. 2015 Ludwig, David

    Adequacy-for-purpose, Value-free ideal, Values

    Full textCitesCited by