philoclimate.ch

BIB  Help  Log in

References »

Expert reports by large multidisciplinary groups: the case of the International Panel on Climate Change. Synthese. 2021 Drouet, Isabelle, Andler, Daniel, Barberousse, Anouk, Jebeile, Julie

Climate change communication, Communication of uncertainties

Cites (6)

Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. The future of climate modeling. Climatic Change. 2015 Katzav, Joel, Parker, Wendy S.

    Confirmation & evaluation

  2. The example of the IPCC does not vindicate the Value Free Ideal: a reply to Gregor Betz. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2014 John, Stephen

    Communication of uncertainties, Reliability & uncertainty, Values

  3. The epistemology of climate models and some of its implications for climate science and the philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2014 Katzav, Joel

    Confirmation & evaluation, Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty

  4. Ensemble modeling, uncertainty and robust predictions. WIREs Climate Change. 2013 Parker, Wendy S.

    Ensemble methods, Reliability & uncertainty, Robustness

  5. Assessing climate model projections: State of the art and philosophical reflections. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2012 Katzav, Joel, Dijkstra, Henk A., (Jos) de Laat, A.T.J.

    Confirmation & evaluation, Reliability & uncertainty

  6. Whose Probabilities? Predicting Climate Change with Ensembles of Models. Philosophy of Science. 2010 Parker, Wendy S.

    Ensemble methods, Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty

Cited by (1)

Cited by these reference in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.

  1. Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2023 Majszak, Mason M., Jebeile, Julie

    Communication of uncertainties, Expert judgement, Values