References »
Climate Models and Robustness Analysis – Part II: The Justificatory Challenge. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. 2023
Cites (13)
Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
The epistemic value of independent lies: false analogies and equivocations. Synthese. 2021
Making Confident Decisions with Model Ensembles. Philosophy of Science. 2021
Robustness reasoning in climate model comparisons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2021
Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View. Philosophy of Science. 2020
Building confidence in climate model projections: an analysis of inferences from fit. WIREs Climate Change. 2017
Computer models and the evidence of anthropogenic climate change: An epistemology of variety-of-evidence inferences and robustness analysis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2016
The epistemology of climate models and some of its implications for climate science and the philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2014
Confirmation & evaluation, Probability & possibility, Reliability & uncertainty
When Climate Models Agree: The Significance of Robust Model Predictions*. Philosophy of Science. 2011
Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Robustness, Values
II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009
I—Elisabeth A. Lloyd: Varieties of Support and Confirmation of Climate Models. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 2009
Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling. Foundations of Science. 2006
Confirmation & evaluation, Ensemble methods, Reliability & uncertainty
Cited by (0)
No reference in the corpus is citing this reference.