References »
Varying Evidential Standards as a Matter of Justice. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2023
Cites (12)
Citations in the corpus, listed by decreasing publication date.
Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2021
Climate scientists set the bar of proof too high. Climatic Change. 2021
Political Legitimacy in the Democratic View: The Case of Climate Services. Philosophy of Science. 2020
Uncertainties, Values, and Climate Targets. Philosophy of Science. 2020
Climate Change Attribution: When Is It Appropriate to Accept New Methods? Earth's Future. 2018
From Social Values to P-Values: The Social Epistemology of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2016
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2015
The example of the IPCC does not vindicate the Value Free Ideal: a reply to Gregor Betz. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2014
Attributing weather extremes to ‘climate change’. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. 2014
In defence of the value free ideal. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2013
The Scientist qua Policy Advisor Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science. 2012
Cited by (0)
No reference in the corpus is citing this reference.